Comparison Recruiting Agencies

Klyver vs Manatal: the alternative for recruiting agencies

Manatal was built for internal HR in Asia. If you run multiple clients from one account, you need a system designed for your model.

Start free trial — 14 days Watch demo

What is Manatal, and who was it built for?

Manatal is an ATS founded in Bangkok with expansion into emerging markets. Its pitch is an affordable AI-powered ATS for internal HR teams: good user experience, a mobile app, LinkedIn integration, and a clean interface that makes onboarding easy.

The problem is its architecture: Manatal was designed for a single company managing its own hiring. There's no concept of an "external client who needs to see their pipeline" or "multiple active accounts at once." For a boutique recruiting agency juggling 6 clients simultaneously, that architecture creates friction at every step.

The most common symptom: agencies using Manatal end up creating a separate account per client just to isolate the pipelines. That multiplies the monthly cost by the number of active clients and doubles the administrative work.

Direct comparison: Klyver vs Manatal

FeatureKlyverManatal
Real-time client portal Included Not available
Multi-client pipeline in one account Native No
Bilingual AI parser Yes~ Generic AI (English)
Commercial relationship CRM Included No
Invoicing and fee tracking Included No
Bilingual support Native~ Limited
Published base price $79 USD/mo $15-35 USD/user/mo
Free trial, no card required 14 days~ 14 days (with limits)

The three differences that matter most in practice

1. The client portal

Klyver includes a portal where each client sees the pipeline for their positions in real time. Manatal has no such module. For an agency with 5 active clients, that's 4-6 hours a week of manual reporting that simply disappears with Klyver.

2. Pricing built for an agency, not a headcount

Manatal charges per user. An agency with 4 recruiters pays between $60 and $140 USD a month. With Klyver, the Growth plan covers 8 recruiters for $249 USD with functionality Manatal doesn't even have, like the relationship CRM and fee invoicing. The total cost of operation is significantly lower.

3. A parser built for bilingual CVs

Manatal's parser was trained primarily on English-language CVs. The formats that dominate the Mexican, Colombian, and Argentine markets (2010-era Word docs with tables, Canva-designed PDFs, scanned files) produce inconsistent results. Klyver trained its parser specifically on CVs from across the Americas.

When does Manatal make sense?

Manatal is a reasonable option for:

  • Internal HR teams hiring for their own company.
  • Organizations with a presence in Asia already using its ecosystem.
  • Companies that prioritize the mobile app and UX over agency functionality.

If your operation is a boutique agency, or an RPO team managing accounts for multiple companies, Manatal wasn't built for your model, and you'll feel it in every process you open.

Migrating from Manatal

If you already have candidates in Manatal, Klyver can import them via CSV export. The process takes 2-4 hours for databases of up to 2,000 candidates. The AI parser structures the information automatically on import.

Keep both accounts active for the first week while you verify all active candidates migrated correctly. Then cancel your Manatal plan.

More comparisons

Klyver vs Pandape → Klyver vs Bizneo → Klyver vs Factorial → Klyver vs Greenhouse → Klyver vs Workable → Full 2026 comparison →

14 days free. No card required.

Set up in 10 minutes. Cancel anytime.

Start free trial Book a demo