An AI search is only as good as your description. The five parts of a prompt that returns a usable shortlist on the first try.
An AI search doesn't guess what's in your head. You give it a description in plain language and it hands back candidates; how good they are depends almost entirely on how you wrote that description. Here's how to build it so the first list is already useful.
"I need a Backend Developer" is a job title, not a profile. The search will bring back everyone with those two words on their LinkedIn, including the person who put them there after a course five years ago.
Describe the person instead: what they built, with which stack, in what kind of company and at what scale. "Backend engineer in Python or Go who has taken a service to production with real traffic, ideally at a fintech or a marketplace, not an agency" filters far better.
Weak: "Senior Product Manager with SaaS experience."
Good: "PM who has owned a B2B self-serve product end to end: set the roadmap, worked closely with design and engineering, and moved an activation or retention metric with numbers they can talk through. Preferably at a 50 to 300 person company. No agency or consulting PMs. Remote with US or LATAM hours overlap."
The second gives you a shortlist you can send for review. The first gives you 400 profiles and three hours of filtering.
Don't rewrite the whole prompt. Adjust in short steps: "from these, keep the ones who stayed at a single company for the last 3 years" or "weight marketplace experience higher". AI search performs better when you treat it as a conversation, not a form you fill once.
Klyver's Sourcing Agent runs this kind of search every night against your open roles and leaves the shortlist ready in the morning, inside the same ATS. You define the profile once when you open the role; the agent repeats it without you rewriting anything.
Klyver's Sourcing Agent builds the shortlist every night. 14-day free trial.