Three ways to fill your positions.
Only one makes sense for volume.
In-house TA
- ✗3-6 month ramp time
- ✗Fixed cost vs variable volume
- ✗Turnover risk
Per-position agency
- ~Unpredictable cost
- ~Weekly Word document updates
- ~No process visibility
Three phases per engagement.
You approve each one.
Week 1: Intake & setup
We intake each position with you: critical competencies, culture fit, real salary range, what's failed before. We configure the pipeline and activate your client portal.
- ✓Optimized JD per role
- ✓Client portal live from day 1
Weeks 2-8: Active search
LinkedIn sourcing, boolean search, candidate network and direct outreach. AI + human review. Only candidates meeting the agreed criteria reach you.
- ✓AI candidate briefing included
- ✓Live pipeline at all times
Close & handoff
We coordinate interviews, manage the offer and accompany through signing. All documentation stays in Klyver — nothing is lost if the engagement ends.
- ✓90-day replacement guarantee
- ✓Full engagement metrics
No other RPO firm in LATAM
gives you this.
Klyver RPO runs on Klyver internally — the same software we sell. Every time we move a candidate, you see it in real time on your portal. No asking. No waiting for the Friday report.
You see how many candidates are at each stage, when the last contact was, which ones have pending feedback from you, and when the next presentation is scheduled. Information that used to take a weekly meeting, available 24/7.
See a real RPO caseYour portal — real time
Questions about RPO.
A recruitment agency charges a fee per position closed (18-25% of annual salary) and works multiple clients simultaneously. RPO (Recruitment Process Outsourcing) works like a dedicated external recruitment team: it takes over the full process, with its own technology, defined SLAs and real-time visibility for the client. The key practical difference: with an agency, each position is a separate transaction. With RPO, the team understands your culture and criteria — and that accumulated knowledge improves each successive hire.
When you need to fill 5+ simultaneous positions, when the volume justifies dedicated capacity but you don't want the fixed headcount of an internal TA team, or when you need complete process transparency. RPO is predictable cost and structured process. An agency is variable cost per transaction.
Cost depends on volume, seniority level, engagement duration, and whether it's single-country or multi-country. Typical models are monthly retainer + success fee per close, or fixed fee per engagement. Both include the real-time client portal at no additional cost. Tell us your situation and we'll send a proposal within 24 hours.
Technological transparency. Klyver RPO runs on Klyver internally — the same software we sell. The client sees the pipeline in real time: how many candidates are at each stage, when the last contact was, what the next steps are. No other RPO firm in LATAM offers this. Their updates are weekly PDFs and status meetings.
Primarily Mexico, with capacity for Colombia, Argentina, Chile, Peru, Brazil and Spain for Spanish-speaking roles. Our first RPO engagement was 6 positions across 4 countries simultaneously — Mexico, Spain, Colombia and Brazil.
What does RPO actually return
vs the alternatives?
RPO ROI is measured in speed, predictability and quality of hire — not just cost savings. Here are the real numbers.
The real cost of an open position
The ROI of hiring an RPO provider starts with calculating the cost of not having the process solved. A vacant Sales Manager at $60,000 USD annual salary has a vacancy cost of approximately $4,000-6,000 USD per month — between lost productivity, team overload, and revenue not generated.
If that role takes 60 days to close with a disorganized internal process vs 30 days with structured RPO, the difference is $4,000-8,000 USD per position. With 8 simultaneous positions, the savings exceed the RPO cost in the first month.
This is why the ROI of hiring an RPO provider is typically 3-8× in the first year — especially for companies in growth mode where every delay has a real opportunity cost.
Calculate your specific ROIVacancy cost reduction (60→30 days)
-50%Structured RPO halves TTH on average. With 8 positions that's 240 days of vacancy eliminated.
Internal coordination time
-80%Without RPO, your team spends 8-12 hrs/week coordinating interviews, feedback and follow-ups. With RPO: 1-2 hours reviewing candidates.
Bad hire cost
-65%Defined criteria, integrated assessments and replacement guarantee significantly reduce 90-day turnover — the most expensive indicator of a bad hire.
Documented average ROI
in year 1 vs manual hiring operations
RPO in Mexico: the specific market
we know best.
The talent market in Mexico has specific dynamics that make generic RPO approaches underperform. Senior candidates in tech, finance and commercial roles receive multiple simultaneous offers — time-to-hire matters more than in almost any other LATAM market.
Nearshoring is generating massive demand for bilingual talent in advanced manufacturing, financial services and engineering — particularly in the Bajío corridor, Monterrey and CDMX. Companies without a structured recruitment process are losing candidates to competitors who have one.
Klyver was founded in Monterrey. Our first RPO engagement involved positions in Mexico, Spain, Colombia and Brazil. We understand the Mexican talent market from the inside — real salary ranges, highest-competition industries and sourcing channels that work for each type of role.
Main operation cities
Mexico City · Monterrey · Guadalajara · Querétaro · Tijuana · Saltillo
Industries with highest RPO demand in MX
Advanced manufacturing · Tech & software · Financial services · FMCG · Logistics & supply chain · Retail
Highest-competition profiles
Bilingual software engineering · Operations managers · B2B commercial roles · Supply chain & logistics
Tell us what you need.
Proposal in 24 hours.
No sales pitch. No 60-minute discovery call. Tell us the positions, timeline and context — we'll send a specific proposal.